<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Claude Opus 5 on AI Tech Blog</title>
    <link>https://jesamkim.github.io/ai-tech-blog/tags/claude-opus-5/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Claude Opus 5 on AI Tech Blog</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.6</generator>
    <language>ko</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0900</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://jesamkim.github.io/ai-tech-blog/tags/claude-opus-5/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Opus 5와 Fable 5 — 코딩 벤치마크와 실무 태스크의 간극</title>
      <link>https://jesamkim.github.io/ai-tech-blog/posts/2026-07-27-opus5-vs-fable5-benchmark-vs-real-tasks/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:00:00 +0900</pubDate>
      <guid>https://jesamkim.github.io/ai-tech-blog/posts/2026-07-27-opus5-vs-fable5-benchmark-vs-real-tasks/</guid>
      <description>Claude Opus 5는 agentic 코딩 벤치마크에서 Fable 5를 앞섰지만, 시각적 생성이나 구조적 산출 같은 태스크에서는 다른 이야기가 나옵니다. 벤치마크 커버리지와 실무 워크로드가 어긋나는 지점을 정리합니다.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
